THE HIDDEN FACE OF SANCTIONS
By Dr. Alan Sabrosky* (who will soon be returning to my show to follow up on his groundbreaking “Israel did 9/11 and the US military knows it” appearance a few months ago -KB)
The sanctions imposed recently against Iran by the United Nations, and later separately by the US Congress, have one thing in common. Both were driven by the US at the instigation of Israel.
But they are also, I believe, generally misunderstood. Sanctions are normally intended to alter the behavior of the country being sanctioned — to punish it for what it is doing, to keep it from continuing practices or policies others find objectionable, or both.
And overtly, that is the function of these sanctions. But that is not their actual purpose.
Now, I do not know whether Iran’s government has a hidden military agenda to its nuclear program. Given Israel’s own nuclear capabilities, and the very different fates of Iraq (which had no nuclear weapons) and North Korea (which did), any sensible country anywhere on Israel’s enemies list — which is by extension today America’s target list — would acquire a deliverable nuclear capability by any means whatsoever as soon as possible.
But the reality is to see sanctions against Iran in the same light as inspections for the non-existent WMDs (weapons of mass destruction) in Iraq in 2002-2003. In those days, the US and its close partners kept insisting that Iraq had WMDs when none of the inspectors on the ground, including the US representatives, found or believed it had.
Yet the claims persisted, and the purpose was to condition the US public for a war that need never have happened, except for Israel and its partisans in the US. And they succeeded. Americans generally believed the false claims, generally supported the war against Iraq, and whatever disenchantment occurred took place only because the war and the subsequent occupation did not proceed as smoothly as its architects had intended.
This is the pattern being repeated against Iran. The real purpose of sanctions is not to affect the policies of the Iranian government, because nothing it does will affect the sanctions. It is to prepare the US public for an attack against Iran, almost certainly in conjunction with Israel, to destroy Israel’s last remaining competitor in the region and to provide a cover for Israel’s expulsion of the Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza, into Jordan and the Sinai respectively.
So it would be unwise either to disregard sanctions or to try to accommodate them. The only sensible response, I believe, for Iran and its friends is to put in place something that the US would not dare to attack. That inevitably means something with or from China or India, especially the former, no matter what the cost — because anything expended to preclude a US-Israeli strike would be far cheaper than enduring that strike and its aftermath, even if the region then exploded in America’s face. Watching an enemy suffer is fine, but not at that price.
*Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D, University of Michigan) is a ten-year US Marine Corps veteran and a graduate of the US Army War College
Webster Tarpley: Obama Preparing to Bomb Iran
Webster Tarpley, author of 9/11 Synthetic Terror, Obama: The Unauthorized Biography, Surviving the Cataclysm, and much more will discuss his critically important new article Obama Is Preparing to Bomb Iran.
Tarpley isn’t the only one warning that the neocons (read Zionist dual-citizen fanatics) are back in the saddle and about to lead the US off a cliff.
Here are some other important recent articles on the same topic:
The Real Aim of Israel’s Bomb Iran Campaign
By Gareth Porter
July 30, 2010 “Information Clearing House” — Reuel Marc Gerecht’s screed justifying an Israeli bombing attack on Iran coincides with the opening of the new Israel lobby campaign marked by the introduction of House Resolution 1553 expressing full support for such an Israeli attack.
What is important to understand about this campaign is that the aim of Gerecht and of the right-wing government of Benjamin Netanyahu is to support an attack by Israel so that the United States can be drawn into direct, full-scale war with Iran.
That has long been the Israeli strategy for Iran, because Israel cannot fight a war with Iran without full U.S. involvement. Israel needs to know that the United States will finish the war that Israel wants to start… (full article here)
Two Resolutions, One World War
By Ruqayyah Shamseddine
“Every war when it comes, or before it comes, is represented not as a war but as an act of self-defense against a homicidal maniac.” – George Orwell
On July 22nd a House Resolution was proposed by 47 US Representatives – led by Rep. Louis Buller Gohmert, Republican Representative from Texas’s 1st congressional district; House Resolution 1553… (full article here)
follow-up Tarpley article: http://tarpley.net/2010/08/10/fidel-castro-warns-of-imminent-nuclear-war/#more-1791
Proof that Bush's PNAC phony scam is a proven fraud.
I'm sure you've seen stories CIA/Google working on total web monitoring. Also consider the recen Washington Post story "Top Secret America".
1) With this massive surveillance infrastructure in place it is sort of hard to beleive that the CIA or NSA have never run across Larry Silverstein's admission that he brought down building 7 and collected insurance money on it?
2) Somehow Obama's snoop goons and Cray comupter algorhtms had missed David Ray Griffin's numerous books or Webster Tarpley analysis of the wargames on that day?
3) Are we to really think that In-Q-Tel or Michael Chertoff and the Justice Dept never ran across Able Danger or http://patriotsquestion911.com? This talk of now going into Iran is not laughable.
4) With all the wiretaping, do you really think Porter Goss and Hillary Clinton don't know how to use gulf-of-tonkin false flag operations?
5) Are we to beleive that Michael Hayden's super computers have never ran across PNAC documents, Smedley Butler's War is a Racket, Prescott Sheldon family ties to nazis, Operation Northwoods documents? His computers have missed Project for the New American Century or Problem-Reaction-Solution or COINTEL? Really?
6) Somehow CIA and Homeland Security and Foxnews have missed Peter Dale Scott analysis of Deep Politics? They all missed The USS Maine Incident, 1898 or The Reichstag Fire, 1933 or Operation Gladio, 1956-1990 or The Attack on USS Liberty, 1967?
7) You or I don't have the massive capabilities of NSA/CIA, yet a simple rudementory investigation leads to Paul Thompson's Timeline which chronicles empires baby steps to America's Riestgag.
8) Somehow, Janet Napolitano is not the least bit suspicous of the timely deaths of theose who spokeout like Paul Wellstone and David Kelly?
9) Somehow, Karl Rove or Rahm Emanuel has never seen http://downingstreetmemo.com or http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com or Richard Gage's work?
10) If all this information is available to you or I, why hasn't it ran across Zbigniew Brzezinski's whore puppet in the White House?
So all of this is proof that they are all on the scam and not interested in safety but more in a fourth riech. When will a grand jury indict these people before the next neocon October surprise?
This information is all over so it is clear that this whole PNAC/BUSH/Obama effort is a fraud! How can people fall for this?